Posts Tagged ‘Cap and Trade’

Maureen O'Connor
Posted on : October 27th, 2009 | By : Maureen O'Connor | In : Cap and Trade

The cap and trade legislation as currently configured will increase costs for small businesses, while probably having little effect on big industry and large polluters.

We think that ultimately, the industries affected by Cap and Trade will pass along their increased C&T-associated expenses to consumers. We don’t foresee a major bump in consumer prices, because we don’t see C&T having a major impact on reducing carbon emissions.

As far as the impact on the sustainability industry Cap and Trade is not a green jobs creator. It is a vehicle created to lower emissions long term, assuage energy lobbyists and special interests and line a few Wall Street firms pockets at the taxpayers’ expense. New energy technologies and alternative energy infrastructure would benefit much more from a real “Carbon Tax” that mandated change, and in so doing, stimulate new, green industrial growth and positive environmental impact.

Tap dancing around emission standards with the smoke and mirrors approach of Cap and Trade won’t help consumers pay the future health insurance premiums and hospital expenses associated with the respiratory ailments and diseases caused by inhaling fossil fuel-based carbon emissions and air pollution. We’re afraid that to be effective in any way, Cap and Trade will need a major overhaul before it gets too far down the road.

Facebook
Twitter
Digg
del.icio.us
Technorati
StumbleUpon
MySpace
Google Bookmarks
LinkedIn
Jasmin Chua
Posted on : October 27th, 2009 | By : Jasmin Chua | In : Cap and Trade

According to a recent report from the U.S. Budget Office, the climate bill will actually end up curbing the budget deficit, instead of putting us deeper in the hole as critics insist. Cap-and-trade legislation, as reported by Bloomberg News, would raise $846.6 billion. Deduct the added $821.2 billion to federal spending and you still have a $24.4 billion net gain, which is a win-win all around. And this spending includes what are essentially cash allowances to factories and polluters. If this legislation passes, we could see greater energy efficiency, less pollution, and a growing sector of domestic green-collar jobs that will boost a flagging economy.

Facebook
Twitter
Digg
del.icio.us
Technorati
StumbleUpon
MySpace
Google Bookmarks
LinkedIn
Janet Dean
Posted on : October 27th, 2009 | By : Janet Dean | In : Cap and Trade

While many people feel that cap and trade is just a license to pollute, a point of view I don’t entirely disagree with, I do support it because it’s been proven effective in the past with reducing sulfur dioxide (acid rain). Cap and trade probably will increase costs for businesses and those costs no doubt trickle down to consumers though my hope is that with cost increases spread out over millions and millions of people, maybe it won’t hurt quite so much (or maybe that’s just wishful thinking).

Regarding the sustainability industry… Ideally, in the interest of making permanent, long-term changes to stem rising costs associated with buying cap and trade credits, industries will be seeking ways to lower their pollution output and thus give a big boost to the sustainability industry. This will, theoretically, create more green jobs and give our economy a much-needed boost while also changing the way companies think about their pollution legacies.

Facebook
Twitter
Digg
del.icio.us
Technorati
StumbleUpon
MySpace
Google Bookmarks
LinkedIn
Adam Shake
Posted on : October 27th, 2009 | By : Adam Shake | In : Cap and Trade

“Cap and Trade” will inevitably raise the price of coal driven utilities. The money spent by utility companies to purchase “Pollution Certificates” will be passed along to the consumer.

Now whether or not the resulting additional expense will be cost prohibitive to businesses and force them to move their production facilities to foreign countries (like some analysts speculate) remains to be seen. Utility costs have been rising for years, and I expect that the manufacturing industry in the United States will consider it another cost of doing business. What will also inevitably happen, is that more businesses that utilize coal driven electricity will look towards new models of electricity generation. We are already seeing many businesses, from car washes to large retail stores, using wind turbines to offset their electricity usage.

Facebook
Twitter
Digg
del.icio.us
Technorati
StumbleUpon
MySpace
Google Bookmarks
LinkedIn
Stephen Del Percio
Posted on : October 27th, 2009 | By : Stephen Del Percio | In : Cap and Trade

If it passes the Senate in its current form, the Waxman-Markey legislation could have serious repercussions for the real estate industry in terms of the energy efficiency mandates that it would impose. Earlier this year, the North American Industrial and Office Properties association commissioned a study to determine the feasibility of the 30 percent reductions in energy that would be imposed by Waxman-Markey. NAIOP focused on a four-story commercial office building in three different climate zones and concluded that, although efficiencies of 14 to 23 percent were possible given current technologies within a seven-year payback period, the 30 percent reductions that Waxman-Markey now contemplates would be extremely difficult for most building owners and operators to achieve absent significant financial incentives at the state and local levels. If passed in its current form, the legislation could thus impact all types of businesses if owners and operators seek to bridge that gap by passing the additional costs of compliance along to tenants or their customers.

Facebook
Twitter
Digg
del.icio.us
Technorati
StumbleUpon
MySpace
Google Bookmarks
LinkedIn
Posted on : October 26th, 2009 | By : admin | In : Cap and Trade, Green

Referring to this recent Wall Street Journal article, what is your opinion on how the “cap and trade” debate in congress will affect business? What about American pocket books? Looking a year ahead, how might the sustainability industry be positioned with this legislation?

Facebook
Twitter
Digg
del.icio.us
Technorati
StumbleUpon
MySpace
Google Bookmarks
LinkedIn